More Ways They are Stealing Our Elections!
More Ways They are Stealing Our Elections!
Educate. Advocate. Mitigate. Activate!
Without free and fair elections America and our civil society are doomed. The Marxists currently running the country have proven that they will do anything possible to keep and expand their power. Money Laundering is just another tactic in their arsenal that is being used to illegally interfere in, and ultimately steal elections.
Money Laundering is an illegal scheme in which criminals disguise the identity, original ownership, and destination of money. Money, obtained from “illicit activities” such as drug trafficking or corruption, is converted into a seemingly “legitimate” source, which is a key operation of organized crime.
And with the findings of Peter Bernegger (Election Watch), Chris Gleason, (Gleason Group), James O’Keefe (OMG Media), Draza Smith and other truth seekers discovering elderly “not employed” / “retired”donor victims aka “Smurf Money Mules” contributions being made in their name without their knowledge or authority, there is overwhelming evidence that ActBlue and other Left-wing PACs are vehicles for the illegal tactic including Elder Abuse and RICO crimes.
Per my last three Substack articles on this subject there is documented evidence of what appears to be hundreds of millions of dollars being illegally laundered per Federal Elections Commission (FEC) publicy available records on the fec.gov website and various other state government campaign finance reporting websites.
This type of Election Interference is not new. E.g., in 2008 (during the *ACORN years) the Obama Campaign was caught and fined by the FEC for not disclosing the identity of over 1,300 donors total nearly 2 million dollars (it was also alleged that the campaign accepted illegal campaign contributions from overseas). The campaign got off easy as it took the FEC four years to make public and levy the fine, conveniently ONLY AFTER Obama won his 2nd term to office in 2012.
So, we should not be surprised that over the last many months several meetings with FEC officials have confirmed that there are very serious issues with reported campaign contribution data that lead to only more questions and concerns.
We are being told by FEC workers that the fec.gov.website database allows for Political Action Committees (PACs), Political Campaigns, Political organizations and Candidates to directly upload their donor information automatically to the site and the FEC DOES NOT CHECK OR VERIFY THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION ONCE UPLOADED TO THE SITE.
Most obviously this is a huge problem, especially given that a PAC like ActBlue DOES NOT verify up to 55% of their donors’ online credit card transactions (or require credit card CVC numbers to donate).
WHY IS FEC ARCHIVED DATA CHANGING DRAMATICALLY?
According to Peter Bernegger of Election Watch: “FEC data changes faster than quicksand, historical data will show numbers for an individual to be a certain amount one week, then two weeks later per the FEC using the exact same query, the numbers change for transactions that happened more than a year ago.” POST
The strange world of FEC data downloaded from their website versus an API tied into their database can show two different results for the same query; while their website is shown on your monitor, their data can change while you’re watching it (we have screenshots); a contribution which already occurred can be dated in the future; they double count some things; they incorrectly count some things; sometimes they count transactions fees as a separate contribution; they have a state named “ZZ”. POST
WA State citizen researchers are validating Bernegger’s claims. Data researchers in Clallam, Thurston, Kitsap, Whatcom and other statewide counties who have been monitoring the FEC website the past month are documenting and recording AN INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF FEC CAMPAIGN DONOR ARCHIVED DATA CHANGES HAPPENING ON A REGULAR BASIS.
HERE ARE SOME MORE EXAMPLES:
A citizen researcher downloaded (exported) FEC data for 81 potential “Smurf” donors and would eventually discover that 1 in 5 would have major changes to the FEC record.
I.e., a re-check of the March 27, 2023, data on April 18, 2023, USING THE EXACT SAME FILTERS AND QUERY, SHOWS THE NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS AND DOLLAR AMOUNTS CHANGED DRAMATICALLY (see below Excel spreadsheet).
E.g., in the 4th entry of the Excel spreadsheet below, using FEC recorded data downloaded April 12, and then downloaded again on April 20 for a female CA donor using the exact same filters.
There is a difference of 370 entries--wiped out, erased, with a dollar value of NEGATIVE ($30,609) over an 8-day period.
Is this evidence of malicious manipulation?
BELOW SHOWS THE DONOR DISCREPANCY RATE of all 18 out of the original 81 contributor downloads = 22.22% between 2017 and 2022. In the two farthest-right columns notice the count and $ difference changes.
OF INTEREST: SEE BELOW SCREENSHOTS OF INDIVIDUAL CONTRIBUTIONS USING ALL IDENTICAL FILTERS. The FEC record reflects that between April 17, 2023, and April 25, 2023, the database somehow gained 1,179,000 contributions between the years of 2017 - 2022. Hmm… The previous year’s archives have changed.
And from April 25, 2023, - April 26, 2023, the FEC record reflects that the database gained 27,000 contributions between 2017 - 2022.
In only 10 days, this is a total gain of 1,206,000 contributions during 2017 - 2022.
But wait, the previous archived 2017 - 2022 FEC data changed again in the last 23 hours, and actually dropped by 583,000 contributions.
April 17, 2023 Screenshot
April 25, 2023 Screenshot
April 26, 2023 - 10:16 AM Screenshot
April 27, 2023 - 8:53 AM Screenshot
What is going on with a live database system like this? Shouldn’t archived final numbers of data be locked in? Who is doing this? Why are these huge discrepancies happening so frequently? Why are they allowed to exist? And where is the accountability and oversight?
A system like this is ripe for potential fraud and fosters and allows the concealment of money laundering. Is this a wink and a nod to nefarious actors?
Is ActBlue trying to cover their tracks? Has ActBlue been infiltrated by some bad-actor Democrat operatives; perhaps we are seeing a rebranding of ACORN?
It very much appears that the FEC policies, database and their software program is set up perfectly to facilitate Money Laundering…
Is this similar in nature as to how the powers that be are manipulating the voter database elections rolls?
Just like Mail-in voting, if everyone is honest it works well. However, if well-paid criminals want to cheat, it is child’s play. E.g., Fetterman getting 655,000 more mail-in votes than Oz, etc…
MORE ISSUES: FEC CAMPAIGN DONOR DATA “DOUBLE COUNTING” DUPLICATE TRANSACTIONS:
Via the FEC website record, a citizen researcher found a “not employed” KS donor had 57,712 contributions all with individual unique transaction ID numbers, totaling $197,131 from 10-5-18 thru 12-30-22. 74% of the contributions went to ActBlue, and 26% to other Left PAC's / Candidates (48 donations to WA State Sen. Patty Murray). 99.9% of the donations are $10 or less.
OF NOTE: According to an experienced data analyst, after sorting the 57,712 donor contributions over 9,000 appear to be duplicates!
This can lead to “Double Counting” of transactions. Again, why is the FEC allowing this information to be present in the data?
And what about the 48,000 + other contributions for this one donor? It is very difficult to believe that any individual could or would ever donate so many times.
The math does not add up. Who donates $1 or 30 cents 20 times each day to PACs or political candidates over the course of years???
Also we have seen as many as 6 PACs each donating to each other in a sequence, one PAC donating to another PAC, that PAC then donating to another PAC, etc.
When asking FEC officials how examples like these are possible, they have no answers or explanations and just say it is the campaign’s data, not our data, and if a problem exists then we need to file a formal complaint with the FEC.
With all the recent data changes we are finding evidence and confirmation of what I warned about in my first article on this subject. Seems to me that the FEC has been weaponized and has no problem allowing this corruption!
There is overwhelming evidence that someone or something is manipulating donor election data in literally EVERY Zip Code throughout the United States to maliciously influence the outcome of elections. Much of the evidence presented shows these are Criminal (RICO) Organized Racketeering Election Crimes.
The Criminal Cartels, Marxists and the Deep State will do Anything to Destroy America!
In my previous articles I have speculated where some of the potential sources of the are money coming from. With the recent indictments showing evidence of fentanyl supply lines from China to the Mexican Sinaloa Cartel, eventually crossing the U.S. border. It makes one wonder, where does the laundering operation money and profits end up? And what are they used for?
Mexican Cartel Drug Trafficking Operations are multi-billion dollar year businesses. It is not a strech to believe that some of this money is being invested (via the CCP, etc.) to illegally influence, fix and rig elections, buy off corrupt politicians and further the Marxist’s goals and agendas to permanently destroy America!
Again, the concern is that if bad actors can so easily launder hundreds of millions of dollars by illegally creating and using fake donors, then creating fake voters and voting for them, may be just as easy, perhaps even easier, especially with newly passed election fraud laws coupled with Mail-in voting.
SOLUTIONS:
FILE FORMAL FEC AND APPLICABLE STATE COMPLAINTS.
Glen Morgan of We the Governed is one of the foremost experts in the state of Washington for filing Public Disclosure Commission (PDC) complaints. Glen has filed nearly 700 PDC complaints against Left-wing organizations, elected officials and candidates. Glen filmed a video and published an article April 5 detailing the ActBlue campaign laundering issues, which included rivers of Democrat campaign cash flowing through Seattle based Perkins Coie law firm in an effort to conceal the funds and smurf / money mules donating to Gov Inslee and AG Bob Ferguson (from both in and out of state).
NO MATTER WHAT STATE YOU LIVE IN - If you have donor "smurf" individuals as potential FEC complaints or have any questions regarding filing your own complaints then please email: Glen@wethegoverned.com
The more documented money-mule victims that are verified, and the more filed Federal and State complaints the better! Due diligence, investigations and following the money trail will lead us to the true criminal perpetrators and much needed reforms.
Other solutions need to be FEC forensic audits, Congressional investigations, subpoenas, and lawsuits!
The good news is that criminal activity is being detected and pursued. Each day there is more evidence of massive corruption. We are committed to, and demand to know and find out who is responsible. True Election Integrity is non-partisan and whoever is intentionally breaking the law needs to be exposed and eradicated!
Bill Bruch
Bill Bruch is the WA State GOP Election Integrity Chairman, WSRP Executive Board Member, 4-Term Skagit County GOP Chairman, Citizen Journalist, Blogger, Business Owner, 2020 WA State House Representative Candidate, Former Council Member, and WA State 2016 RNC National Convention Delegate.
OTHER RELATED ARTICLES, VIDEOS, RESOURCES, LINKS:
Seven Charged in ACORN WA State Vote-fraud Scheme
Ex-Seattle ACORN worker: ‘I paid the price’ for Voter Registration Fraud
18 Former ACORN Workers Convicted or Admitted Guilt in Election Fraud
ACORN Pleads Guilty to Voter Registration Fraud in Nevada
Confessions of a voter fraud: I was a master at fixing mail-in ballots
VIDEO: O’Keefe Media Group Uncovers Potential MASSIVE Money Laundering into Political Campaigns
Draza Smith Exposes RICO - Fake Voters and Fake Donors: Data Is Exposing the Steal
U.S. Indictments Trace Fetanyl Supply Lines from China to Mexico
Massive digital manipulation of voter rolls in Florida!
This reads like a good ‘who done it’ mystery! Great job and thank you for providing all the links.